Re: UPDATE: command: shift_edge

[Thorsten Wißmann <edu _at_ thorsten _minus_ wissmann _dot_ de>]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 07:42:31PM +0100, Thorsten Wißmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:53:33PM +0100, Thorsten Wißmann wrote:
> > So the open question is: What's the cleanest and best fixup?
> > 
> >   - Solution B: Remove the setting focus_follows_shift. Is anyone
> >     out there using this option with the value 0? This option was
> >     initially added for compatibility because the initial shift-command
> >     didn't reset the focus.
> 
> But I don't know anybody who uses focus_follows_shift=0. So I started a
> discussion about handling a probably dead configuration (and probably
> dead code). I think we just can remove it without affecting anything.

I just removed the option.

So what's missing for v0.5? Maybe the rule name patch already posted
here. What else?

Regards,
Thorsten